FMP Institutional DCF

An independent DCF calculation from an external financial data provider, built with its own growth and discount-rate assumptions. Comparing it to the platform's own DCF is a quick cross-check: rough agreement is a mild reassuring signal, and a wide gap is worth investigating rather than assuming either figure is right.

Two independent DCF estimates for the same company rarely match exactly, because a DCF's output is only as good as its inputs: the projected growth rate and margins for each forecast year, the discount rate used, the terminal growth assumption or exit multiple, and how recent the underlying data is. The platform's own DCF and this externally supplied figure are built on separate assumptions and, often, a different data vintage, so a gap between the two is expected rather than a sign either one is wrong. Practitioners generally treat close agreement between independently built DCFs as a mild corroborating signal, and a wide divergence as a prompt to check which input — growth, discount rate, or terminal value — is driving the difference, rather than assuming either figure is more accurate.

Proprietary FMP methodology